Refused by IRCC? 4 Options After a Refusal

Being refused by Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) can feel disheartening and stressful. Whether you've faced a spousal sponsorship refusal, a work permit denial, or an Express Entry rejection, the setback can leave you wondering what to do next. The good news is that a refusal doesn’t have to be the end of your Canadian immigration journey. In fact, you typically have four main options after a refusal: reapply, judicial review, reconsideration, or changing your immigration program. Each path has its pros and cons, and the right choice depends on your situation. In this blog post, we’ll break down these four options, with examples, so you can understand which might be best for you.

Option 1: Reapply (Submit a New Application)

Reapplying to the same program is often the first option people consider after a refusal. In many cases, you can choose to submit a new application to address the issues that led to your refusal. This can be a straightforward and cost-effective approach, but it’s important to reapply only when it makes sense:

• When Reapplying Makes Sense: If your initial application was incomplete or missing documents, or if you now have additional evidence that strengthens your case, a reapplication can be worthwhile. For example, if your Express Entry application was refused because you forgot a required document or your police clearance was expired, you could gather all the correct paperwork and reapply. Likewise, if a work permit was refused due to insufficient proof of funds or an unclear job offer, you might reapply with more robust documentation to satisfy the visa officer’s concerns.
• When Reapplying Is Not Possible: In some situations, reapplying isn’t an option. Perhaps the program you applied to has closed or changed (for instance, a pilot program that expired). Or you might no longer meet the eligibility; maybe the score required in a points-based system is now too high for you to reach. In these cases, submitting the same application again would likely lead to another refusal. For example, if you applied through an economic immigration program but the program has closed or your Comprehensive Ranking System (CRS) score in Express Entry is below the cutoff, reapplying without a significant change won’t help.
• Address the Refusal Reasons: If you decide to reapply, make sure to fix the issues from the first application. IRCC officers will see that you had a prior refusal on record, so don’t submit the same information and expect a different outcome. Provide a cover letter or explanation addressing how you have improved the application or corrected past mistakes. For instance, if a spousal sponsorship was refused due to insufficient evidence of your relationship, a new application should include more substantial proof of your genuine relationship (photos, communication logs, etc.). If a work permit was refused due to doubts about your intent to return home, the new application could include stronger ties to your home country or an explanation of your temporary intentions.

Example: A skilled worker’s work permit was denied because the officer believed the job offer wasn’t genuine. The employer realized they hadn’t included a key document. The applicant gathered a more detailed job offer letter and additional proof of the company’s legitimacy, then reapplied. The second time, with a complete package, the work permit was approved. This example shows reapplication can succeed when you meet the requirements and address the refusal reason. However, if nothing has changed or you’re fundamentally ineligible, reapplying will likely just result in another refusal.

Option 2: Judicial Review (Challenging the Decision in Court)

If reapplying isn’t possible or you believe the refusal was unfair or legally wrong, the next option is a Judicial Review. Judicial review is a process where you ask the Federal Court of Canada to review IRCC’s decision for errors or unreasonableness. It’s essentially a legal challenge – not a traditional appeal, but a chance to have a judge examine whether the immigration officer’s decision was made properly.

Key points about Judicial Review:

• When to Consider It: Judicial review is often considered a last resort or a strong option in cases of multiple refusals or when you can’t simply reapply (for example, the program is closed or you no longer qualify). If you suspect the visa officer made a serious mistake in applying the law or ignored key evidence, judicial review might be appropriate. For instance, imagine your spousal sponsorship (inland) was refused because the officer doubted your marriage is genuine, even though you provided ample evidence. If you have no right of appeal (inland sponsorships cannot be appealed to the tribunal), you could ask the Federal Court to review that refusal as unreasonable. Similarly, if your work permit was denied and you believe the officer overlooked important documents or used the wrong criteria, judicial review lets you challenge that decision.
• Strict Deadlines: Timing is critical. You generally have 15 days from receiving the refusal to file a judicial review if you were in Canada, or 60 days if the decision was made while you were outside Canada. These deadlines are very strict – miss them and you lose the chance to have the court hear your case. So, if you’re considering this option, you must act quickly.
• What the Court Does (and Doesn’t Do): In a judicial review, a judge will look at the existing record of your application and the officer’s notes; you cannot introduce new evidence during the court process. The judge won’t replace the officer’s decision with a new decision, and they cannot directly approve your visa or application. Instead, if you win the judicial review, the court “quashes” (overturns) the refusal and sends your case back to IRCC to be reconsidered by a different officer. In other words, a successful judicial review gives you another shot at the application, but doesn’t guarantee an approval – the new officer will review your case and make a fresh decision. (Often, though, if the court found serious errors in the first refusal, the second look can lead to a positive outcome.)
• Time and Process: A judicial review can take a few months or more. Often there is first a written phase where you must get “leave” (permission) for your case to be heard. Many cases are resolved without a full hearing if the government agrees to settle and re-open the file. If there is a hearing, it could take 6+ months from start to finish. This process is legal in nature, usually requiring an immigration lawyer (but not required) to prepare arguments and represent you in court.
• Appeals vs. Judicial Review: It’s important to note that most refusals cannot be appealed in the traditional sense (there’s no appeal tribunal for a refused work permit, study permit or Express Entry). The term “appeal” is usually reserved for specific cases like sponsorships or removal orders. For example, if your spousal sponsorship application from outside Canada was refused, you have a right to appeal that decision to the Immigration Appeal Division (IAD) of the Immigration and Refugee Board. That is a different process where you can present new evidence at a hearing. But if you have no appeal available (as with most visa refusals and all in-Canada applications), judicial review is the way to challenge the refusal. In summary: a family sponsorship refusal can sometimes be appealed to the IAD within a tight deadline, but a work permit or Express Entry refusal must be challenged via judicial review in Federal Court

‍

Example: A foreign worker’s work permit application was refused because the officer supposedly found the job offer documents “insufficient.” The applicant felt this was a mistake. Upon obtaining the officer’s notes via an Access to Information and Privacy request (also called ATIP), it turned out the officer overlooked a key letter from the employer. The applicant filed for judicial review, arguing the refusal was unreasonable. The Federal Court agreed the officer made an error and quashed the refusal. IRCC had to redecide the case, and on the second try the work permit was approved. This example shows how judicial review can be effective in overturning an unreasonable refusal. However, remember there’s no guarantee – it simply gives you another chance under a fair process.

Option 3: Request Reconsideration from IRCC

A reconsideration request is an informal way to ask IRCC to take a second look at your application. Essentially, you’re writing to the visa office (often via the IRCC webform) to say: “I believe a mistake was made in refusing my application. Please reconsider your decision.” This option can be quicker and doesn’t cost anything in government fees, but it’s only suitable in certain situations.

When to Request Reconsideration: Generally, you would pursue reconsideration only if you can point to a clear error or oversight in the refusal. For instance, maybe the officer misunderstood a fact or overlooked a document that was in your application. Or perhaps there was a change in rules that the officer didn’t apply correctly. A classic example is when IRCC changes a rule or policy, and an application submitted before the change is mistakenly assessed under the new rules. If your refusal seems to stem from such a mistake, a reconsideration request is a way to gently remind the officer of the error and ask them to fix it.

• Example 1: You applied for a spousal open work permit in early January, but new rules came into effect later in the month tightening the eligibility. Your application was refused under the new criteria, even though it should have been assessed under the old rules (since you applied before the change). In this case, a reconsideration request can point out that your application met all the requirements at the time of submission and that it was unfair to apply the new rules retroactively. By clearly explaining the timing issue, you’re asking the officer to reopen your file and approve it under the correct (old) criteria. This is exactly what some applicants have done when caught in rule changes, and officers have reversed decisions in such scenarios.
• Example 2: In a spousal sponsorship refusal, suppose the officer’s notes indicate they missed a piece of evidence; for instance, they wrote “no proof of ongoing communication,” but you had actually included chat logs in your application. You could request reconsideration, highlighting that the evidence was indeed provided (with page references to your submission) and politely argue that the decision was based on an oversight. Sometimes, if the mistake is obvious and significant, an officer might agree to overturn the refusal without you having to appeal or go to court.

Important limitations: A reconsideration request is not the time to submit lots of new evidence or explain things you didn’t include originally. In fact, immigration officers typically will not consider new documents or information that wasn’t in the original application. So if you realize you should have included your bank statement or a letter of explanation but didn’t, simply asking for reconsideration with that new document attached likely won’t work – the officer will say you need to reapply to have new information considered. Reconsideration is meant for errors on their side, not to fix omissions on your side. If you have new evidence or information that could change the outcome, the better approach is usually to reapply (Option 1) with a complete application, rather than to ask for reconsideration.

Outcome and Timing: There’s no formal deadline to request reconsideration, but it’s best to do it as soon as possible. Some requests get answered in a few weeks, while others might never get a clear reply. Success rates are generally low because officers have wide discretion to simply stand by their original decision. However, it’s a relatively low-effort, low-cost option – so if you truly spot a mistake in the refusal, it’s often worth a try. Just remember to keep your tone professional and respectful, and clearly point out the error you believe occurred.

Option 4: Change Your Immigration Program or Strategy

Sometimes, the best way to overcome a refusal is to try a different pathway altogether. Canadian immigration has multiple programs and categories. If one route isn’t working out, you might have an alternative route to your goal. This option involves evaluating your situation to see if you qualify for another program that might be more successful.

Why Change Programs? A refusal may signal that the particular path you chose is not the right fit under your current circumstances. Perhaps the requirements are too strict, or the visa officer isn’t convinced you meet the criteria for that specific program. Instead of banging on the same door again and again, looking at a different door can be wise.

• Study Permit vs. Permanent Residence: For example, if your study permit applications keep getting refused because the officers doubt your “temporary intent” (they suspect you might not leave Canada after studying), you could switch gears and apply for permanent residence (PR) directly. A program like Express Entry might be an option if you have the qualifications for it. By aiming for PR, you eliminate the concern about leaving Canada after studies, since as a permanent resident you intend to stay. Many skilled workers qualify for Express Entry, which, if approved, lets you live, work, and study in Canada without needing a separate study permit. In other words, if the temporary visa route isn’t working, the permanent route could be a solution.
• Economic vs. Family Sponsorship: Conversely, if you tried to immigrate through an economic program like Express Entry but got refused (or can’t meet the points threshold), consider whether you have a family-based option. For instance, if you didn’t succeed via Express Entry and you have a Canadian citizen or permanent resident partner, spousal sponsorship might be a viable path. We’ve seen cases where someone with a low CRS score for Express Entry later married their Canadian partner and was able to get permanent residence through sponsorship. Family sponsorship has different criteria – it doesn’t care about your language scores or education points, but focuses on the genuineness of the relationship and the sponsor’s eligibility. Switching to a family class application can be a game-changer if an economic class pathway isn’t open to you.
• Temporary to Permanent, or Vice Versa: Another scenario might be a Francophone applicant whose study permit was refused. If you are a French-speaking professional, you might qualify for Mobilité Francophone (a special work permit program) or a provincial program that favors Francophones, which could be easier than getting a study permit. Or if a work permit isn’t working out due to lack of Canadian experience, perhaps pursuing a short study program in Canada could later make you eligible for a post-graduate work permit and eventually PR. Essentially, look at your end goal (temporary stay vs. permanent immigration) and see if there is a different route to achieve it.

Example: A candidate applied to the Express Entry Federal Skilled Worker program but fell short of the cutoff score and their application was refused. They realized that with their skills, they might do better if they were nominated by a province. They shifted focus to a Provincial Nominee Program (PNP) and also happened to have a girlfriend in Canada who was a citizen. They pursued both angles; the PNP gave them extra points for Express Entry, and eventually they also married and went through spousal sponsorship (legit marriage, not for immigration purposes). One way or another, they created new options rather than sticking solely to the original path. This example shows creative thinking: changing the program or combining strategies can turn a refusal into an eventual success.

In summary, don’t be afraid to change course. If one program isn’t yielding results and you qualify for another, it might be time to pivot. Just make sure you actually meet the eligibility for any new program you consider, and understand the implications (for example, applying for PR is a bigger commitment than a temporary visa). It can be helpful to consult with an immigration professional to map out alternative strategies tailored to your situation.

Moving Forward After a Refusal: Choosing the Best Path

Facing an immigration refusal can be overwhelming, but remember that you have options and rights. The four options discussed - reapplying, judicial review, reconsideration, or changing programs - are not mutually exclusive in every case. In fact, sometimes people pursue more than one option at the same time. For example, you might submit a new application and file a judicial review of the refusal concurrently, or request reconsideration while preparing to reapply. There’s no one-size-fits-all answer; the right move depends on why you were refused and your personal circumstances.

If you made it this far in the blog, I am happy to discuss your refusal and the way forward free of charge in a legal consultation. Send me an email to info@marinimmigrationlaw.ca, and I am happy to schedule a free call to review the best options after a refusal.

Here are a few final tips to consider:

• Understand Why You Were Refused: Carefully read your refusal letter and, if possible, access the detailed notes (GCMS notes) from the visa officer. Knowing the exact reasons is crucial to deciding your next step. Was it a documentation issue, an eligibility issue, or the officer not being convinced of something like your intent or relationship? Your strategy will differ in each scenario.
• Act Quickly for Legal Challenges: If you plan to go for a judicial review or an appeal (for those cases where an appeal is available, like a spousal sponsorship refusal outside Canada), be mindful of the deadlines. They can be as short as 15 or 30 days, so don’t delay if you intend to challenge the decision formally.
• Be Honest with Yourself: Sometimes refusals happen for a reason that will not magically go away with a new application. If an officer was not satisfied with your credibility or felt you didn’t meet the criteria, ask yourself if you truly addressed those issues. For example, reapplying for a visitor visa with the same ties to home and no new evidence will probably yield the same refusal. Changing approach (either by judicial challenge or by a different program) might be more effective in such cases.
• Consider Professional Advice: Immigration law can be complex. If you’re unsure which option to choose or want to improve your chances, having a consultation can help you understand what to do. Marin Immigration Law can evaluate the refusal reasons, help you weigh the options (maybe your case has a strong argument for court, or maybe it’s simpler to fix and reapply), and guide you through the process. As IRCC’s processes can be legalistic (especially with court reviews), having experienced guidance can make a big difference in outcome.

Ultimately, a refusal is a setback, not a dead end. Many applicants who face an initial refusal go on to succeed by taking the appropriate next step. Whether it’s trying again with a stronger application, fighting the decision in court, asking for a second look, or finding a new pathway, there is hope after a refusal. Stay informed, be proactive, and don’t hesitate to seek support if you need it. Canadian immigration can be challenging, but with persistence and the right strategy, you can still achieve your goal of coming to Canada despite an early refusal. Good luck!

‍